Antibiotics criteria 2.0
More than 70 percent of the antibiotics sold globally today are used in the breeding of food-producing animals – only 30 percent are used for human health care.
Antibiotic overuse is a widespread problem in food production. There is a clear link between sub-standard animal husbandry and an extensive use of antibiotics. Sweden has shown that it is possible to reduce the use of antibiotics radically while still maintaining production. Compared with many countries, Sweden today has, on average, very low consumption. However, in several countries within the EU and in countries outside the EU, the problem is big. Antibiotics are used in some countries, not only when the animals are sick, but also for preventive purposes to enable keeping the animals healthy in a sub-standard environment. Antibiotics are also used for purely growth promotion purposes, a procedure that was banned in Sweden in 1986, and within the EU in 2006.
Antibiotic resistance – one of the biggest threats to global health
The more antibiotics are used, the greater the risk that the bacteria will develop resistance, resilience and immunity to them. The medicine simply does not work anymore. This leads to an increased spread of resistant bacteria, between humans, between animals, and between animals and humans, creating a global health issue. Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Public Health Agency of Swedish state that antibiotic resistance is one of the biggest threats to global health. Currently, at least 700,000 people die each year due to diseases related to drug-resistant bacteria. In 2050, the number is estimated to rise dramatically to 10 million people if actions are not taken to counteract the development.
To reverse the trend of increased antibiotic resistance, increased responsibility needs to be taken in all sectors that use antibiotics. As the largest use of antibiotics today is in animal husbandry, all actors in the food chain have a responsibility to minimize the spread of antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals. Effective efforts that reach all levels require collaboration. Therefore, Axfoundation, together with companies, academia, authorities and industry associations, and civil society organizations, has developed a clear list of criteria and an associated questionnaire that buyers can use in the dialogue with suppliers of meat and dairy products, as well as fish and other seafood. By working together, we can jointly reduce the use of antibiotics and contribute to better animal welfare.
The list of 8 criteria
There are 8 criteria in the antibiotic criteria list, addressing both direct antibiotic use and preventive interventions that can lead to reduced antibiotic use. For each criterion, there are associated questions to use for supplier dialogue and follow-ups.
Criteria for reduced, direct antibiotic use
- Antibiotics must not be used for growth promotion purposes.
- Antibiotics must only be used following the prescription by the veterinarian and must be approved for use in food-producing animals in accordance with Codex.
- There must be detailed documentation of all the use of antibiotics, including via feed and water. The responsible veterinarian must regularly review and sign the documentation. Data on the use of antibiotics should be available on request from the actors in the supply chain.
- If recurrent antibiotics are used for all, or the majority of, an age-specific category of animals, the reasons for this must be documented, an investigation must be carried out by a veterinarian and an action program to counteract the health problems must be developed and applied. The goal is to phase out recurring use.
- Colistin, fluoroquinolones and third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins – antibiotics that are particularly important for human care, must only be used when a veterinarian deems that no other treatment options are effective.
- For active work with reduced antibiotic use in the herd/facility, a plan with routines for preventive health care and reduced spread of infection must exist and be followed. The plan shall focus on strategic preventive animal health management, including infection control and animal welfare (see full document for what the plan must include).
- Animals must not be mutilated because of inadequate animal husbandry.
- Animals must be kept in a way that gives them space to move freely and be able to rest in a way that is suitable for them.
Criteria for preventive, indirect interventions that can lead to reduced antibiotic use
The first version of the antibiotic criteria was developed through an inclusive process during 2013-2014. They were first tested within food retailer Axfood and whole-saler Martin & Servera and then launched widely during 2014. The members of the Swedish Food Retailers Federation – Axfood, Bergendahls, Coop, ICA, Lidl, IKEA Foods and Livsmedelshandlarna – adopted a common policy to decrease the use of antibiotics in food production in 2016. The policy was based on the first four criteria in Axfoundation’s Antibiotic criteria 1.0, and only applied to the companies’ private labels. Since then, the members of Swedish Food Retailers Federation have also strived to influence their suppliers of other brands to follow these criteria.
During 2019-2020, Axfoundation updated the antibiotic criteria to adapt to new legislation, changes in consumer behavior and, to further encourage a positive development in animal food production. During the course of the process, companies, academia, authorities and industry associations and civil society organizations collaborated to find common ground on the issue. This process also led to the Swedish Food Retailers Federation adopting a new common policy in 2020, based on the first 6 of the 8 updated criteria.
Axfoundation’s criteria 2.0 go beyond legislation and were strengthened in, primarily, four key areas:
- Limiting the use of antibiotics especially important for human health care.
- Clarified animal welfare criteria regarding animals in cages and mutilation of animals. The list has also been developed with criteria relating to routines for preventive animal welfare work.
- Improved questionnaire that companies can use in dialogue with their suppliers, including clearer recommendations for follow-up.
- Seafood is now included and both the criteria and the questionnaire are adapted.
Today, Axfoundation works to spread the antibiotic criteria 2.0 among Swedish food retailers and food service, to national and international bodies and to authorities to achieve transformative change.
actors and key experts were involved in developing the criteria 2.0 launched in 2020.
strengthened criteria are the result of the broad collaboration.
companies within retail and food service use the antibiotic criteria v.1.0. Axfoundation is now aiming for even more actors to adopt version 2.0.
Act to inspire & inspire to act
The work that Axfoundation has carried during several years has inspired several other important initiatives to decrease the use of antibiotics.
- Köttguiden (The Meat Guide): Axfoundation’s antibiotic criteria form the basis for the selection criteria in WWF’s guide for consumers.
- ReAct: The criteria have inspired the expert organization ReAct, who conducts global advocacy regarding antibiotic resistance. ReAct has developed a toolbox for people and Axfoundation has contributed to a further development of the Toolbox so that it now also includes animal welfare, environment and agriculture. The WHO has endorsed ReAct’s Toolbox, and it is used across the globe by people working to address antibiotic resistance.
- EAT Initiative: Axfoundation has together with EAT Initiative carried out several seminars and talks focused on antibiotic resistance and food within the framework of Stockholm Food Forum.
- Antibiotics within the EU: Åsa Domeij, sustainability manager at Axfood, the antibiotic expert Christina Greko at the National Veterinary Institute, Örjan Brinkman, chairman of the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC), Carolina Sachs Axfoundation’s secretary general at the time, and Mattias Espert, pig farmer and vice chairman of Grisföretagarna (The association of Swedish Pig Farmers) and others were present when the antibiotic issue was raised at a seminar in the European Parliament in September 2016. The seminar was arranged in collaboration with Alde, Alliance for Liberals and Democrats European Group and Fredrik Federley from the Centre Party.
The Antibiotic criteria 2.0 was developed by Axfoundation in collaboration with a group of experts comprising Max Troell from the Beijer Institute / Stockholm Resilience Center, Jenny Lundström from Friska Djur (Healthy Animals) and Frida Lundmark-Hedman from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. In addition, a broad reference group actively participated in the development, with representatives from the food industry, civil society, academia and government; Axfood, Coop, Findus, Gård & Djurhälsan, ICA, Lidl, The Swedish Food Federation, The Federation of Swedish Farmers (LRF), Martin & Servera, SIWI, The National Veterinary Institute, (SVA), Swedish Food Retailers Federation, The National Agency for Public Procurement, Vi Konsumenter), World Animal Protection, WWF in Sweden.